PRAYER OF THANKSGIVING TO LIVING ARCHANGELLESS DODDIE LAPOINTE, TEMPERENCE MI

O Darling! O Darling Doddie! O Doddie with cuckhold hubbie Bob of Holy Angelic Mention! The Divine Inspiration that I have gotten from you and the other Angels of the Communion of Saints has shaken me to the core! I know now that fidelity to one man is the only sin that God (a Black Womb~an) will never forgive, that all white husbands need but to pay child support for Niggh children not theirs, that getting raped is the surest way for a women to suffer into subspace Nirvana, for the morning after pill "Take Action," "Plan B" is the woman's only sacrament in the Extreme Ecstatic Union of Pregnancy, especially unwanted but deepdown REALLY WANTED (gets their clik hard for novel strange dik don't it?), that prostitution at any level is superior to goddam ?Holy?Poo! wedlock, and that a girl needs to steal everything her husband or co-hab partner has including wedding or engagement rings and hock them for a new guy purty and violent to beat the fuk out of her and impregnate her with kids she will never abort but will always get her lawful awful wedded to pay child support. Thanks for that revelation about the Demonology of the Demons who run those Pentecostal and Fundamental Churches who are by glossos interpreters are all lying about those interpretations which in tongues really mean FUK OVER ANYTHING THAT HAS A DICK AND BALLS ALWAYS GET HOLY PREGNANCY ALWAYS ABORT FOR WHEN THE RAPTURE AND REVELATION CUMS THE LORD WILL NOT GIVE A DAM ABOUT US WE ARE ALL GOING TO THE CENTER OF EARTH HELL YA MIGHT SAY MOLTEN HOT IRON AND BASALT AND GRANITE HOT AND MOLTEN WHO WANTS TO GO TO HEAVEN UP THERE ANYWAY JOE HOVAH IS A WHITEBEARD HOMELESS OLE PEDOPHILE QUEER Y'KNOW THEM REVELATIONS FROM YOUS GIRLS ARE REALLY MAKING ME REPENT THAT I EVER WANTED TO BE TRUE BLUE TO ANY OF YOU BITCHES BUT WILL RATHER CELIBATELY JAK OUT AND JACK AWAY BUT BY SUCH CONJURY-BRAINSTORMS AS THESE GET THE WHOLE WORLD BLISSFUL WITH THE HEAVEN OF TN E+ TN E+ TN E+ TN E+TN WITH GA GA GA GUH MO RECYCLING PHUNS AS SO DEFINEDLY POOPOPLEXED GOOD INFIDELITY AND NOT GIVING A SHIT ABOUT THEM OLD RULES JUST GO TO MASS AND PICK UP SOME BLAK MEAT AND GET PG AND HAVE A PHUN MORNING-AFTER-PILL ABORTION THEN GET QUICKIE DIVORCE (OR ANULLMENT FOR THEM OLE QUEERS WE HADTA MARRY YOU SAY AND HE NEVER HAD NOTHIN WITH WHICH TO FUK SO ANULLMENT IS FUN) (THEN HIT IM FOR A NEW MARRIAGE STATUS POST CHILD SUPPORT FOR ALL KIDS NOT HIS AND GET REMARRIED THEN (SCHAZAAM! ANULLED AGAIN USING HIS MONEY AND WEDDING RING TO PAY FOR THAT LEGAL SHIT TO REALLLY FUK UP THEM NICE HUSBANDS AND MAKE EM INTO CUM-EATING CUCKS LIKE MITCH MCCONNELL IN HIS CELIBATE MARRIAGE WITH ELAINE AND DON TRUMP (HE IS DONALD TRUMP AND    R E A L L Y   R E A L L Y   APPROVES OF THIS CHEER CUCKING MESSAGE FROM HEAVEN AS DOES LIBERTY UNIVERSITY PAT ROBERTSON AND ALL THEM GUYS WHO AS PENTECOSTALISTS SERVE TIME FOR TAX EVASION AND FOR BEING DEADBEATS NOT PAYING CHILD SUPPORT FOR KIDS THEIRS AND ALL-NOT-THEIRS. THANK YOU FOR THE VISION, DARLING DODDIE THAT ANYONE WHO GIVES A SHIT ABOUT STOPPING A WOMB`AN FROM CATEGORY-WHORING AROUND AND GETTING PREGNANT ON THEIR LAWFUL WEDDED NEEDS TO BE BOILED IN CRANKCASE OIL ENGINE GUNK AND WITH FLAMETHROWER WEAPON SET AFIRE AND ALL OTHER TORCHERS THAT GOD (BLACK WOMAN) METES OUT TO THE UTTER PROFLIGATES WHO WANT TO STOP MARITAL INFIDELITY.

LUV! LUV U FOREVER EVER EVER EVER EVER FOR GIVING ME THIS PIPELINE TO THE COMMUNION OF SAINTS ESPECIALLY THE DYKE ARCHANGELS LIKE TRACY HOWARD SCOTT WHORE FOR THE SICILIAN MAFIA IN CICERO IL AND PIMPED GOOD AND KIDNIPPED BY PIMP NIGGAHS AND GANGBANGED TO THE PLACE WHERE SHE BEFORE GOING TO HEAVEN WITH PADRE'S GIFT ROSARY ROUND HER NECK TO BE BURT UP TO ASHES AND TOSSED INTO THE OHIO RIVER PAID FOR BY THE COUNTY JEFFERSON KY USA

ANYWHO! LUV U!

WANNA TURN THIS INTO A BLOG STATUS POST PRONTO, AND LET THE WHOLE WORLD KNOW THA CUCKOLDRY IS THE ULTIMATE LOVE, THAT TOO OPEN AND WHORING MARRIAGES ARE THE   A N S W E R   TO MARITAL UNHAPPINESS THAT ALL MEN NEED EITHER TO BE MOST PAINFULLY JILTED OR BARRING THAT CASTRATED BY DYKES OF CRUELEST VARIETY, ESPECIALLY THOSE DYKES WHO NO LONGER HAVE MAGIC, HAVE BEEN ANULLED FROM KNOWING THE FUTURE OR PAST OR PRESENT OR ANY GODDAM THING BUT TORTURING ANYTHING ANYONE ESPECIALLY DECENT AS THEY ARE PROFESSEDLY INCARNATE HATE INCARNATE DEATH ARE ABORTUSES FROM SANSKRIT OUTER SPACE AND ONLY NEED TO BE FIREBOMBED LIKE DRESDEN GET M ALL IN ONE BIG DYKE PLACE AND DROP NAPALM ON M AND WATCH M CRY AND REPENT ALL THE CASTRATIONS THEY DUN AND KEEP ON NUKING THEM WITH NAPALM AND ENGINE GUNK SET AFIRE AND LAFF LAFF LAFF

BOY DARLING DODDIE U ARE A LAFF! THINK THESE DIVINE REVELATIONS WILL SHAKE THE NATIONS RAISE THE DEAD AND WHAT THE HELL I WILL JAK TO YOU ALWAYS WHEN YOU SEND THESE DIVINE REVEALS MY WAY.

WITH PASSIONATE WHITEHOT FURIOUSLY BURNIN SUNFIRE LOVE FOR YOU AND YER CUCK BOB

I AM JEST

v lynn sissy, transF, a "milker" to now every now and then I mean a gallon of Homo VD gurl's milk poison to the touch or even thought of any ole queer-oriented Thing (Cosa as in Cosa Nostra; OR Pis as in Pis Asmatach dig?)

i am 44D and growing in the chest bursting with the passion i have for you and yours Honeys

by'

DENNIS NOW TELLS ME OF THIS REVELATION FROM THE DYKE ANGELS OF HE'EN GIRLS COMMIT ONLY ADULTERY BE UNFAITHFUL ABORT HUBBIE FETUSES GET PG BY BLACK PICKUP GYS HAVE HUBBIE CLEAN UP HIS BLACK JISM

 OPEN LETTER TO ALL THE WOMB`ED, WING`ED OR UN-WING`ED!

THE ANGELS SPEAK TO ME, DODDIE LAPOINT OF TEMPERANCE MI, TRACY DYKE ARCHANGEL OF HELL'S ANGELS IN HEAVEN, ALL THE GIRLS OF THE COMMUNION OF SAINTS DECLARE DECRY ANNUL ALL DOMS AND WITH BRUTE ANGELIC FORCE EXPLODE

THE MAFIA THE MAFIA WITCHES THE DYKES THE TOOTHFAIRIES OF HOMOSEXUAL ZEROES

NEVER AGAIN THE ANGELS DECREE

NEVER AGAIN BE MARRIED JUST WALK AWAY FROM HUSBANDS #ADULTERY_THE ULTIMATE_FUN ANGEL RENEE STOUT OF UPSTATE NY CONCURRING NEVER AGAIN BE FAITHFUL NEVER USE A RUBBER ALWAYS HAVE EXPERIMENTAL PREGNANCIES ABORTED WITH RU486 MORNING AFTER PILLS TAKE ACTION! PLAN B! CHEAP ABORTIONS ARE THUS A CHEAP EAT FOR YOU AND YOUR NEXT PICKUPS

AGAIN! NO FIDELITY TO ANY BASKETBALLED BASEBALLBATTED THING=> BE FREE #TORTURE_SADISTS, #SLAVE_REVOLT_VIOLENT!

SAINT DEATH SANTA MUERTA CONFIRMS DEATH DYKE DIE DYKE INCARNATE DEATH DYKE BLIND BLIND BEHIND NO MAGIC DYKE DIE #NO_FUTURE_OR_FUTURE_TELLING #INCARNATE_DEATH_DYKE_ALL_R_DYKES_DIE_DEATH_INCARNATE_4EVER_AND_EVER

AN EFFORT TO PRESENT RESULTS, CONTRA PLAGARISTS

I have crashed the laptop on which I had done most of my work on St. Denys, whose primary intent had been to write a redaction-study monograph for my University of Louisville. The gist of the monograph was to use stylometry/statistical-linguistics which in result-- in confirmation of work by Bernard Brons-- was to demonstrate plural authorship or editor-ship in the Corpus Dionysiacum. This work had been months in preparation, with mainstay statistic being the odds-ratio for the various putative contributions of the CD, along with computation of confidence-intervals pertaining.
Such an exoticum in text would as noted here for this blog have limited readership, a matter of wee import to the project overall. As I can and will, I do think my findings at hand are significant-enough to publish, via this medium as barely acceptable, but willdo-nonetheless.
The gist of my findings would be that the "Mystical Theology" of the CD-- an unquestioned text for authenticity so-far, compares well to the style of the first five Epistles in Denys; the evident most-esteemedly-authentic of the "Divine Names," while perhaps showing some evidence of verbal-padding and other editing for the sake of Orthodoxy, is next-best by comparison to the MT; the "Celestial Hierarchy," albeit while showing more phatic/assertive theology than the apophasis of the MT and main-DN and the Epistles 1-5 for which Denys is mainly known and regarded, indeed DOES show signs of being in the same style as MT.
I now write from an Android Tablet; everything about typing and other usuals of blogging are handicapped to a great extent. Nevertheless, I have at-hand-here what would seem to be the only way in the catastrophic situation of world-pandemic, to tell all, tell the world about my findings, in the best way I can.
Apologies that what-few readers may ever glance upon this work, with my only defense being that I publish first my results, which are sound, before some plagarist gets an idea to cheat away my good results, claiming them for his/her own.


vernonlynnstephens@gmail.com

OFF-BEAT ON-BEAT IN ST. DENYS

OFF-BEAT ON-BEAT IN ST. DENYS

What I notice here/now is in St. Denys a dys between the off-beat (PLEEMMELEES) and on-beat (HARMONIA) <to use this Padre's own words; the off-beat would have to include inter alia the perp's academic forgery; the category self-generalted PLEEMMELEES needs as well to count the number of matters with which the Wholly Man Denys takes issue, finds disagreement. This latter part of the first-mentioned category the-off-beat would include the very way Denys alludes to the Neoplatonists without quoting them, and the way he quotes the "Oracles" (Scripture in the Judeo-Christian tradition) often with great "bending" of terms and "cherry picking" of examples Biblical which would speak to Platonic ideas.

This would include his "hots" for Eroos in over-use than the word Agapee, PRIOR TO WHICH TIME (evidently the 5th century C.E.) THIS WAS TOTALLY NOCHRISTIAN USE, but according to Andrew Louth the ilk of terminology in Plato's SYMPOSIUM. Also "drunkenness" (METHEE) in Denys is a virtue EKSTASIS (which then and now had strong semantics in the domain of "psychosis); and, subsequently, there is some positive evaluation for God and for Disciple in the common sequel to stone-cold-drunkenness, i.e. hang-over (KRAIPULA). . . positive evaluations which in the 5th century of our Era and now 21st century would beckon disfavor and if favored, well qualified favor, or more-likely, dilution.

He proffers mercy-- especially to Pagans with whom the Christians found disagreement-- he chides clerics who "excommunicate" sinners bold enough to seek the Synactic Eucharist-- he disputes with thoses "Christian Positivists" who find literal, not hinted at the transcendental, the Magisteria of Dogmatics and Scripture (and in this is saying what could apply to all who hold Dogma, "The-Revelations" as closed system); he seems completely apophatic toward the Infinities in God as per these hints to which I refer, EXCEPT in the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy which dotes on the finitudes of imputed Blessings of Church and Religious Office and Its Rites. . . which are indeed KATAPHATIC in mention directly from what Denys says. 

For harmonies in Denys, we have the uninterrupted praise-ecstatic of the "Uber-ness" of Godhead, WOW WOW WOW; except for the sticky Positivism of the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy this goes on  a n d  o n  a n d  o n; if, when I was a clinical social worker I would guess him to be expressing "overvalued ideas," that is, ideation which keeps repitition with no notice on the utterer's part that such ideation is pathological; THIS SPEAKS TO AN OBSESSIVE PERSONALITY, AT THE CORE OF WHICH PERSON IS ANGST. This obsessive-compulsive tendency is as well noticeable in the great precision with which Biblical arguments are used to express latent-- or overarching-- Platonism.

Of WHAT would this FORM (HARMONIA) be a result? If we can guess by the several "hot buttons" presented, and as well the "hot buttons" of the time, we may conjecture that there may have been in Denys an agitation that by the Magisteria the Church (especially in the East) was wronging, was doing more wrong than Good. The Chalcedonian versus the Monophysite controversies in Denys are "ducked" largely, with both sides in the controversy citing Denys as authoritative (and sometimes as heretical or "bastardly" (NOTHOTIKOS) of no authority). Denys seems to be well-connected to have access as Churchman to the Scriptures (this would not be an easy accomplishment as documents were rarities, and as the Fathers jealously guarded THEIR Biblicism), and of Denys' obvious esteem and access to Platonic works as well. . . hidden from mention because-- as is known to us-- Caesar Justinian had outlawed schools and any teaching of Platonism.

Then this would be the obsessive-compulsion of whom's what would be called now a "moderate liberal," who finds The-Transcendent to be somewhat for which to get ecstatic, to the point of drunken joy, and while I am still puzzled about how to "get hard" (EROOTIKOS) for what for-me is always a LIE, my merriment also considers God's-- and Disciples'-- "hangover" resulting-- an off-beat-in-the-on-beat of Form into which and about which  this Subject Denys feels strongly enough to utter a forgery claiming these hetero-doxies as Ortho and Apostolic. I guess Denys felt secure about The-Lie, and indeed (with the help of some quirks in French hagiography about a Denys First Bishop of Paris, from Greece) the forgery lasted numbers of centuries, and is still "good reading" though well-acknowledged to be "bastardly lie" in origin.

Yet comes the point where my own "religiosity" butts into Denys=> to an exaltation, to a True-Belief time, my religious experiences are LIES, and always some Godly Puncture of my ecstasies "gets me right that I am wrong." My puncture is Barthes' PUNCTUM; it is Denys' PLEEMELEES, the off-beat which becomes the "heartbeat" of Denys' ROUTINIZATION OF CHARISMA the-hamony of FORM as Blissed Drunken Hungover OVERVALUED IDEAL "MADNESS." Denys wants to bring this ecstasy about in something of the same way as the Mystery Religions prior and in Proclus or even a little later than the Mysteries in Gnosticism=> indeed one noticeable observation about the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy is that he with other "insiders" has Spirit that should only be expressed to "Catecumens" in corny pictographic (?pornographically-literal?) symbols, WHICH THE ENLIGHTENED HAVE TRANSCENDED AND MAY EXCLUDE OUTSIDERS. Yet for-me, again, the Spirt of Discomfiture of Mysticism, by problem-solving, critcally-thought pursuit until finding me at Naked Truth, the truth naked before me, the Truth-that-I-am-Naked ends the Spirit jailed
                                                                                   and whimpering "I have sinned against The Holy Ghost!"

. . . So are the differences 'twist St. Denys and my-me!

vernonlynn stephens sissy UofLouisville

NOTE!! MUCH DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK ON DIONYSIUS CALLED AREOPAGITE IS HELD IN MY (vernonlynn stephens', sissy's) GOOGLE CLASSROOM ON THIS SUBJECT; SEE THIS  H I G H L I G H T E D LINK, PER FAVOUR. . . .

                                                                                   

In Dionysius. the praxix of ''community writing,'' which is the practice of publication in which a number of participants

I have spoken of "community writing," which is the practice of publication in which a number of participants in a process of copying, adding (usually) or subtracting material from Ur-Sources to propagate added/subtracted ideas in documentary transmission. This can appropriately be called "redaction" (as I understand the definition in Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary 10th), and it can be called simply "editing." Redaction Criticism is unfortuately merely referent to Bible Redaction and-- predictably with the hardshell evangelicals-- nixed (I suppose as somewhat/something that could offend "true believers").

I want by all means to get-away from the Bible-Bangers who seem blind to the reality that in publication, in any "then" and any "now," are edited quite usually, that is ARE redacted. There are books and articles now about modern redactional work, and I have a goodly number of these in my data folder "Redaction Studies." Some of these are about editing in anncient work-- including yet not restricted to Bible studies-- and I have a variety of texts that speak to a "how" and "why" of redaction. These methods and motivations for edits are to my liking best expressed in an article I have in this folder, that is The Rules of Redaction, Identify, Protect, Review (and Repeat) Eric Bier, et al., in IEEE COMPUTER AND RELIABILITY SOCIETIES, November/December 2009. This doc treats of redaction as it usually signifies in modern editorial work-- as subtracting-/blacking- out material that is "sensitive" in a document, as is the case in the recent Mueller Report and in the publication of health-/HIPPA- related information. Yet my Dictionary (just mentioned) definition that could include ADDING material to a text.

The gist of the Bier et al. article is that redaction is needed when "sensitive information" is in a text. Pertaining methinks to the Corpus Dionysiacum, I think awareness that Denys heavily (and covertly) uses material from Neo-Platonists and Plato himself=> Proclus references stand at 500X, Plotinus references are 91X in these works; Platonic works are given reference 216X. I think one can pay less attention to Bible citations and Patristic citations in the CD for the simpler reason that such reference would be "expected."

I have PDFs alleging forcibly that "community writing" is evident in Denys; Brons has mentioned parts of the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy and the Letters have (perhaps pious) insertions to the would-be Dionysius-original. There are predictable "pseudipigraphal" texts attributed to Denys-- I have what would seem to be the-majority of these. Then-- referring to "community writing" there are the propagation of Pseudo-Pseudo-Denis TRANSLATIONS, in the West with Hilduin, Eriugena, St. Victor guy, Clowde of Unknowing guy, Boke of Privie Counsel guy, and all those who use Dionysius "in community" in the crabbed way of publication and editorial work ending with the printing press, and now especially with digital-age-publication.

Moreover, with my Critical Edition (Suchla and Heil/Ritter) of the Corpus of St. Dionysius, I can follow textual insertions/substractions in this text transmission, some of which seem to correct glitches in the text from-heretofore, and some PURE efforts to change/"purify" Denys' utterances.

IT IS IMPORTANT TO ME THAT I NEED TO USE THE "EVANGELICAL'S DENIAL" OF REDACTIONS FOR "HOLY," "MAGISTERIAL" METERIAL, AND THIS SEEMS TO DERIVE FROM THE USUAL CLOSED-SYSTEM THAT AN "ORTHODOXY" WANTS, IN THIS WAY, AS WELL, TO "EDIT BY DENIAL" (OF IMPORTANCE, OF VALIDITY) A PRESERVATIVE NECESSITY TO "FREEZE" THE NARRATIVES THAT MAKE THE CREEDS OF THE-MAGISTERIA "FOREVER" AND UNCHANGEABLE. DENYS-- A PROVEN FRAUD IN HIS SOURCING, A PROVEN INNOVATOR IN THE NOETIC UNDERSTANDING OF THE-INFINITE, THE-DARK-OBSCURITY OF TRANSCENDENCE AS AGNOSTIC-- IS NOT SCRIPTURE, IS NOT PER SE A CHURCH FATHER, HAS BEEN DEBUNKED AS AN APOSTLE-- AND
                                  IN SUCH A CASE I CAN DOCUMENT WITH A REAL KIND OF REDACTION-CRITIQUE, EDITORIAL-ANALYSIS, THE "ANYTHING-GOES" OF "COMMUNITY WRITING."

vernonlynn stephens UofL Campus Sissy

NOTE!! MUCH DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK ON DIONYSIUS CALLED AREOPAGITE IS HELD IN MY (vernonlynn stephens', sissy's) GOOGLE CLASSROOM ON THIS SUBJECT; SEE THIS  H I G H L I G H T E D LINK, PER FAVOUR. . . .

'completeness and wholeness' in DA~CD

'completeness and wholeness' in DA~CD

Consider the null hypothesis that has been given to me by Tan=> a document needs  to be considered as a complete whole; let me guess just how far one can go with this in naive reading=>

Let me pick up a piece of paper with writing on it; naively I can despite "fishy" signals perhaps that one and only one writer uttered the text with no revisions; one might begin to wonder about this assumption when the text begins to show sharp differences in seeming sense to be inferred, or even big or average contradictions (nobody could be expected to be completely logical in all points uttered over a "long run" of living!) Other differences, like the handwriting/autograph showing variance in the assumed "complete whole"=> a more emphatic difference coming to the reader's attention might be that a whole language may differ inside the document. Totally different kinds of constent per writ may shift. What would be a worst-case-scendario for obvious plural challenges to the "complete whole" of the text. . .
                                                                                            would it not be a blatant "hodge podge" of challenges to an assumption that a document has unity of purpose, style, "autography"? <I think I could make such a hodge podge document by picking up litter with writing from the sundry wastes and glue them all together into {what would be obviously illogical} a silly doc that-- like the Gordian Knot-- be utterly un-decipherable.><This means, in my way as "silly redactor," that I am taking a "community"/KOINONIA into that writ expressing cacophony. This thought experiment-- easy to replicate empirically-- has what would seem to be a none-but-valid result/conclusion=> the "complely whole" document thesis cannot stand.>

<One should notice in this statement that per the Corpus Dionysiacum I wish to take (in assuming the null hypothesis of Tan's whole-and-complete ass-u-me) that something obvious and termable in Dionysius' vocabulary these jumblings of surds; the very fact is that CD is a collection of inputs in series, first in Denys himself borrowing from NeoPlatonists and Church Padres to one stage of publication; then this Ur-CD being added subtracted textually by subsequent others. With a semi-random sampling into my texts by Suchla/Heil/Ritter, I have noticed that most of the textual variations are for rather redundant expressions, likely with the motive of offering a "good text with good sense"=> there are other texts in the "extended" Corpus-- those suggesting radical digression from the usuals in Denys (that are assumed to be borrowedly origninal with this guy who claims to be Dionysius Areopagite of Acts 17). "Eyeballing" these extant docs, it looks as though the repetition of the matter-- really the false-report by my science from Leo Oppolzer's KANON DER FINSTERNISSE-- of a ?global? eclipse of the sun occuring at the very moment of the death by crucifixion of Jesus. As well, we can count the "Liturgy of Dionysius" which is guessably false production as extant only in  L A T I N. . .

I am familiar from other reads of "pseudipigrapha" and "lives of Saints' " hagiography that this kind of jarring awareness of "community authorship" readily applies to Denys and works attributed to him-- usually wrongfully when beyond what are now held to be the Corpus Dionysiacum-- and never as is the case of much writing from ancient times that "the editiorial," "the-forged" hand of some "outsider" has input which is transmitted on-down-the-line until commonly-- even by Catholics-- the entire CD "shooting-match" is pseudo.>

In other words, speaking to the suspect assumption of "completely whole" documents from ancient time, the presentation of "glares" and "misfits"from this assumption will lead us to assume possible validity to my "alternate (chosen) hypothesis of "mixture" not purity of authorship, rather speaking to a practice of editorial work which seems blatant and common PASSIM in ancient and medieval literature. To me now, this kind of assay could become perfectly empirical, for there would seem to be little reason to hold that these "glitches" sundry could not be framed into a solid empirical design.

The "glitches"seem perfectly consonant with PUNCTUMs (Barthes) and "primary reflection" (Marcel) as well as other phenomenological and psycho-analytic work. I could present my "case study" as producing such testable hypotheses of "documentary tampering" counter to Tan's notion that certain ancient texts (the NT) must be regarded as "whole," "complete" with then only shifts of emphasis re different "Gospel-like" holy texts. . .

Previously and to this moment I have found (per Ding-an-Sich case study of Denys) CD vocabulary to relate to these-- mostly modern linguage constructs-- categorical designations. <See prior entries in my writs on the topic upon Corpus Dionysiacum for vocabulary-Greek-in-CD to apply to this work, now seeming to take shape and form!>

vernonlynn stephens sissy

NOTE!! MUCH DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK ON DIONYSIUS CALLED AREOPAGITE IS HELD IN MY (vernonlynn stephens', sissy's) GOOGLE CLASSROOM ON THIS SUBJECT; SEE THIS  H I G H L I G H T E D LINK, PER FAVOUR. . . .

DIONYSIUS' WORK READS LIKE AN IMMENSE HYMN, OR ONE LONG HYMN-ECSTATIC AFTER ANOTHER!

I have "spoken-around" the repetitive nature of St. Denys' writing, and abide with the notion that as per "gold standard" in qualitative case study research, intend to use the VERY words of Dionysius to form case-study categories, as categorization is essential for such work, and additionally for the process of content analysis going to establish categories. NOTE HERE= FROM THE LIDDELL-SCOTT (MEGA) GREEK LEXICON, THAT DENYS' USE OF "HYMN" (UMNEEOO) CAN IMPLY THAT WHICH IS SAID OVER AND OVER; 

               INDEED, DIONYSIUS' WORK READS LIKE AN IMMENSE HYMN, OR ONE LONG HYMN-ECSTATIC AFTER ANOTHER!

vernonlynn stephens UofLouisville campus sissy

NOTE!! MUCH DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS WORK ON DIONYSIUS CALLED AREOPAGITE IS HELD IN MY (vernonlynn stephens', sissy's) GOOGLE CLASSROOM ON THIS SUBJECT; SEE THIS  H I G H L I G H T E D LINK, PER FAVOUR. . . .