Toward Portrayal, Valences ~DA

Toward Portrayal, Valences ~DA

RKJ TAN "DEFINING (AS FUNDAMENTALIST ANTI-REDACTION-CRITIC) THE SET

Defining the Set. . .

=> Wisely done, one should not portray "too too statistically" the found valences of Denys, positively-expressed, and by valence-hidden/crypto; almost no readers but the few stats-savants will balk at such dominance. Moreover, the data are descriptive, thus more nominal than showing magnitude. A listing of probable findings may "do" better than any presented array of numbers. "Defining the set" in terms may please "Good Reader" might best present the conclusion, and as several "loops around" the "setting" CD are thus a descriptive "triangulation" . . .

But what or how may we might make of a combination of several such "loops" be accomplished as-statistical? THE CONTENT OF THE LOOPS MAKES THE SET; THINK ABOUT USING THE MULTINOMIAL TEST WITH CATEGORIES=>
Type
Aschematic
Antitype.. . 
<all of these tri-partitions-names have utterly Greek roots, could-too just use their Greek Ur-expressions.>. . .

which would seem "a leg up" on the structure-finding I was taught in "sociological theory" (Professor Michael Endres) and here include the silly typological imputations of Claude Levi-Strauss. <Endres grated on me by the assertion ASSUME STRUCTURE, THEN GO OUT AND FIND IT!" The Endres' method for structural-functionalism was the method of "Religious" (believe first a propostion, then find it hard-as-thou-canst!) and those whomever other who do not follow logical inferential procedures. Yet, given the "Good Reader" reference, I SHALL HAVE TO  R E A L L Y  JUSTIFY WHY I IMPOSE THIS MORE-COMPLICATION; IT MAY BE THAT THE STATS (IF DO-ABLE) WOULD BEST BE KEPT UNPUBLISHED, OR-- GIVEN THE ACADEMIC CONTEXT AND NEED FOR QUALITY-SCHOLARSHIP-- BE PLACED AS AN APPENDIX AT THE END OF THE "WORK-DISSERTATED."

P.S. See notes by Gabriel Horn-- in French-- describing Denys' frequent mention of EROOS as "violent."